Geist Finance shuts down after Multichain-related losses

Defi lending project Geist Finance announced they would be shutting down after more than $200 million was drained from the Multichain project in two separate events in early July. Geist Finance had previously allowed people to borrow against assets bridged via Multichain, and had over $29 million TVL. However, price oracles are no longer reporting accurate prices of the bridged equivalents of tokens, which are now largely unbacked thanks to the missing assets, and trading at a massive discount to the original tokens.

Geist paused their smart contracts on July 6, then reenabled the withdraw and repay functions on July 9, while waiting for news from Multichain. Now that Multichain has confirmed that the missing hundreds of millions will not be recovered, Geist has announced they will not reopen. If they were to do so, the platform would almost immediately take on bad debt as people exploited the price discrepancies.

Multichain added, "Just to be clear this is in no way an attempt to blame Chainlink oracles which worked as they should. There are no oracles for the Multichain assets themselves because there was the expectation to exchange them 1:1. Nobody is to blame except Multichain here."

Multichain finally confirms their CEO was arrested in China

After a months-long saga involving "stuck" transactions, Multichain announcing they couldn't get in contact with their CEO, rumors that the whole team was arrested, and several suspicious transactions of more than $100 million each, Multichain has finally announced that their CEO — known only as Zhaojun — was arrested on May 21. According to the project, all of his devices, hardware wallets, and mnemonic phrases were taken by Chinese police during the arrest. "Since the inception of the project, all operational funds and investments from investors have been under Zhaojun's control. This also means that all the team's funds and access to the servers are with Zhaojun and the police," they wrote.

The Multichain project claimed in a lengthy Twitter thread that the team attempted to keep the project running by using stored credentials on Zhaojun's home computer, thanks to access provided by his sister. However, they say that the July 6–7 movement of $130 million out of the project was an "abnormal" transfer by an unknown party. They claim that the July 9–10 transfer of around $107 million was his sister attempting to preserve assets by moving them into wallets she controlled. According to the team, his sister also was arrested on July 13, and "the status of the assets she has preserved is uncertain".

"Due to the lack of alternative sources of information and corresponding operational funds, the team is forced to cease operations," they wrote. They also claimed that they don't have control over the domain pointing to the frontend of the project, and so are unable to take the project offline, and resorted to pleading with GoDaddy for help in doing so.

"Honestly he deserves jail for this level of cryptography incompetence alone," wrote crypto personality 0xfoobar on Twitter.

SEC, CFTC, and FTC sue Celsius; CEO Alex Mashinsky arrested

Alex Mashinsky sitting onstage, wearing a Madonna microphone and a t-shirt reading "Banks are not your friends." with the Celsius logoAlex Mashinsky (attribution)
A multi-agency hammer came down on the bankrupt cryptocurrency lender and alleged Ponzi scheme that was Celsius. The co-founder and former CEO of the company, Alex Mashinsky, was arrested and charged with seven counts including securities and commodities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to manipulate the price of Celsius' CEL token. The indictment also named Roni Cohen-Pavon, Celsius' former Chief Revenue Officer.

Alongside the indictment from the DOJ, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) each filed their own separate lawsuits against Mashinsky and Celsius.

These latest lawsuits join an existing lawsuit, filed in January 2023, against Mashinsky by the New York Attorney General.

Digitex Futures CEO to pay $15 million over commodities violations

Adam Todd, the CEO of the Digitex Futures exchange, has been ordered to pay $3.9 million in disgorgement and $11.7 million in penalties. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission won a default judgment against him in their lawsuit alleging violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, including failing to register as a derivatives exchange, attempting to manipulate the price of the DGTX token, and failing to implement proper KYC and anti-money laundering programs.

According to Todd in a YouTube video, "We do not need to do KYC. [...] You should not have to give them because the U.S. government or whatever other [expletive] government in the world says that you need to. You do not need to. You just do not." Well, in that case.

Todd was also accused of trying to artificially inflate the price of the DGTX token by buying it on third-party exchanges, writing out his plans in excruciating detail with a customer who provided him funds to use on pumping the token.

OptyFi shuts down, citing regulatory threats and failed fundraising attempt

OptyFi, a so-called "AI-powered defi" project, announced it would be shutting down for a variety of reasons. First, they blamed their recent failed token sale, in which they had hoped to raise $600,000. They blamed this failed sale on their Discord project being hacked, and on various community members falling victim to a fake token sale link.

However, they stated that the main reason they decided to shut down the project was the "significant and mounting regulatory challenges", pointing to the recent claim by the BarnBridge defi project that they were under SEC investigation. According to OptyFi, they are concerned that the $OPTY token or OptyFi vault tokens could be deemed securities, or that the OptyFi vaults themselves could be determined to be a "Mutual Fund type vehicle".

OptyFi promised to refund any tokens purchased during the most recent token sale, but many community members still accused the project team of rug pulling. OptyFi had previously raised $2.4 million in a seed funding round in January 2022.

Platypus Finance hacked for the second time

Platypus Finance paused their pools after they were alerted to what they described as "suspicious activities". Security firm PeckShield was apparently the first to notice the activity, sending them a dreaded "hi, you might want to take a look" tweet that has become their signature way of alerting protocols that something bad has just happened. The CertiK security project also tweeted that they'd observed multiple suspicious flash loans involving the project.

This is the second apparent hack of Platypus Finance, following an $8.5 million hack only ten days after it launched in February 2023. The first hack also involved flash loans.

New Rodeo Finance project exploited for the second time in one week

An attacker manipulated a price oracle to drain 472 ETH (~$884,000) from Rodeo Finance, a new Arbitrum-based leveraged yield protocol. The thief then used Tornado Cash to tumble the funds, some of which they placed into staking programs. According to Rodeo Finance, the attacker initially exploited the protocol for closer to $1.7 million, but $810,000 was recovered. Small victories. Anyway, Rodeo paused the protocol, and stated that they are working on recovery plans.

This was actually the second attack to impact Rodeo Finance in a single week. On July 5, the same day as their public token launch, the project was exploited for around $90,000 thanks to a bug in a smart contract.

NFT phisher charged over OpenSea lookalike scam

A sad-looking Bored Ape wearing a yellow fisherman's hat and bandolier, smoking a cigar, on a bright orange backgroundBored Ape #7358, originally purchased by Hank666 for 49 ETH ($175,000 at the time) (attribution)
The U.S. Attorney's Office of the Southern District of New York announced the unsealing of charges against Soufiane Oulahyane, who they allege created a lookalike OpenSea website to trick victims into entering their login details, and used sponsored links in a "popular internet search engine" to cause his site to show up as the first result when a person searched "opensea". A victim with the OpenSea name "Hank666" entered his credentials into the scam website on September 26, 2021, and Oulahyane quickly used the credentials to transfer his crypto assets, sell his NFTs, and transfer the proceeds of those sales to his own wallet. Altogether, Hank666 lost assets that he had paid around $449,000 to obtain.

Oulahyane is charged with wire fraud, two counts of access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

AlgoFi announces shutdown

AlgoFi, a lending protocol built on the Algorand blockchain, announced that they will begin winding down the project. They were vague about the specific reasons, writing only that "a confluence of events has taken place that no longer makes building and maintaining the Algofi platform to the highest standards a viable path for our company". Although AlgoFi is nominally decentralized, like many defi projects, its fate ultimately rested with the small team building it.

AlgoFi had raised a seed funding round of $2.8 million in November 2021, and was backed by groups including Union Square Ventures, Arrington XRP Capital, Pillar VC, and Y Combinator. They had also received other investments from groups including Jump Capital and Coinbase Ventures.

AlgoFi accounts for over half of the value on the Algorand blockchain, which itself has experienced a marked decline from earlier this year.

Multichain drained of another $107 million days after previous theft

Only five days after $130 million was emptied from the Multichain blockchain bridge, another $107 million in a wide range of assets has been taken. After the first theft, Multichain urged users to stop using the project and revoke contract approvals, but a large quantity of assets remained on the service.

People are becoming increasingly suspicious that the Multichain thefts may be an inside job, not least because Multichain's CEO suddenly disappeared in late May and hasn't been located since.

Arkham Intelligence referral program exposes user emails

In a somewhat amusing complement to Arkham Intelligence's "on-chain intelligence exchange" announcement, a new product which seeks to allow people to buy and sell private information about blockchain wallet owners, Arkham has found themselves in hot water for exposing user email addresses without the users' knowledge.

Like many platforms, Arkham Intelligence allows its users to earn rewards for referring new customers. Users are given a unique link to invite others to sign up, which then credits them for the referral. However, some people have observed that the unique string used to identify the user is simply their email address, base64-encoded. This is a simple way of encoding a piece of text, which is trivially reversed to expose the email address.

A user who noticed the encoding strategy tweeted: "ABSOLUTE LMAO. ALL #ARKHAM REFERRAL LINKS SHARED ON TWITTER IS DOXXING EVERYONE BECAUSE THE EMAIL IS IN THE REFERRAL URL". They then went on to decode some referral links from anonymous crypto personalities, writing "HOW DOES IT FEEL TO GET DOXXED???"

Arkham Intelligence quickly updated its referral program to use an encryption algorithm that can't easily be reversed in this way, and the CEO apologized for what he said was an early version of creating referral links that was never updated.

Arkham Intelligence releases "dox-to-earn" project

Arkham Intelligence, a blockchain intelligence company with the tagline "deanonymizing the blockchain", announced the launch of its "on-chain intelligence exchange", inviting people to "buy and sell information on the owner of any blockchain wallet address—anonymously, via smart contract." In the crypto world where transaction data is largely public, maintaining pseudonymity is often a critical part of maintaining safety and privacy. Needless to say, this had a mixed reception, with many terming the exchange "dox-to-earn".

"hey isn't the most profitable use of this just to put a bounty on whale wallets and then kidnap people? like ... did that come up in any meetings?" wrote one Twitter user. "We are now one step closer to onchain assassination markets", wrote another. Others, however, were more optimistic, speaking about "doxx[ing] scammers", "democratiz[ing] tools [the government] already has", and, in the longer term, "accelerat[ing] privacy".

Dubai regulator cracks down on BitOasis

Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority issued an alert that BitOasis was "under review for not meeting mandated conditions". In April, BitOasis received the first "MVP Operational License" issued under a new regulatory regime in Dubai, but has apparently already fallen out of compliance. VARA warned that further enforcement actions could follow, including rescinding the license.

BitOasis wrote on their website that the license had in fact been suspended, but stated that they had not begun offering services to the segments covered by the license (institutional and qualified investors).

BitOasis is among the most popular crypto exchanges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.

Arcadia Finance exploited

Arcadia Finance is a defi margin trading protocol that launched on Ethereum and the Optimism Ethereum layer 2 protocol in March 2023. On July 9, an attacker used a flash loan to drain liquidity pools in the lending portion of the project, resulting in a total loss to the project of around 160 ETH and $163,000 in stablecoins for a total loss of almost $460,000.

The Arcadia Finance team paused related smart contracts to prevent further attacks, and began working with various crypto security projects to investigate the attack. They also sent on-chain messages to the attacker, threatening law enforcement action and suggesting they "return 90% of the funds... and walk away".

Hackers swipe pricey NFTs after compromising Gutter Cat Gang Twitter profile

A leopard-spotted cat with half-lidded eyes, wearing a black doo-rag and white shirt with "HODL" printed on it, on a purple backgroundGutter Cat #707 (attribution)
An attacker successfully compromised the Twitter account belonging to the popular Gutter Cat Gang NFT project, as well as the one belonging to the project co-founder, and used them to post links to phishing sites claiming to be a new NFT airdrop. Instead of receiving the tokens they were promised, those who authorized the contract had their wallets drained.

One victim lost 36 NFTs, among them a Bored Ape NFT they'd purchased for around $130,000. Altogether, the attackers successfully stole NFTs worth between $750,000 and $900,000, depending on how resale value is estimated.

The following day, Gutter Cat Gang announced that they'd regained control over the Twitter accounts and taken down the malicious tweets. They stated that they were working with law enforcement to investigate the theft, but to the dismay of some victims, did not describe any plans to compensate those who lost assets.

"Decentralized" BarnBridge closes up shop after claiming they are under SEC investigation

A small and rather unknown project called BarnBridge aimed to build a variety of defi yield projects. BarnBridge claimed to be decentralized and governed by a DAO.

On July 6, an attorney posted in the project's Discord server to say that BarnBridge and "individuals associated with the DAO" were under investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The attorney wrote: "To reduce potential further legal liability, existing liquidity pools should be closed, and no more liquidity pools should be started. All work on Barnbridge related products should stop, and individuals should no longer be compensated for any work they do related to Barnbridge until further notice." Decentralized!

It's not terribly surprising that BarnBridge chose to drop the facade of decentralization when the SEC came knocking, however. A recent case by the CFTC against the Ooki DAO suggests that the mere veil of "decentralization" will not be sufficient to avoid legal liability for the actions of a DAO. However, it is interesting to see the SEC now (at least allegedly) going after a relatively small player in the defi world.

Multichain shuts down amidst $130 million suspected hack

Blockchain watchers observed $130 million in various assets flowing out of the Multichain blockchain bridge, questioning whether there had been an exploit. Multichain tweeted, "The team is not sure what happened and is currently investigating," and recommended users stop using the service and revoke contract approvals.

Several hours later, Multichain wrote that they had stopped service, and that "all bridge transactions will be stuck on the source chains. There is no confirmed resume time."

In May, Multichain suffered a bizarre slew of issues, culminating in the project team admitting that their CEO had gone missing and could not be contacted. So far, they have not reported his return.

This is also not the first hack suffered by Multichain. In January 2022, the project, bafflingly, publicly announced a security vulnerability that was affecting their tokens, without first instructing users to safeguard their tokens. Attackers quickly followed the instruction manual provided to them by Multichain, making off with around $3 million in assets.

NFTPerp blows up

A project called NFTPerp was, as the name suggests, a perpetual futures exchange for NFTs, allowing people to take long or short positions against NFTs. It relied on a vAMM — virtual automated market maker — which essentially simulates liquidity without there being any real money in the system. Such a system can be thrown out of whack if there is imbalance in the positions people are taking — for example, if everyone tries to go short on NFTs in a brutal bear market.

So anyway, that's exactly what happened. NFTPerp announced that they would be sunsetting their popular beta project after accruing bad debt.

How they're going about it has been controversial among the successful traders on the platform: essentially, those who were in profit will lose their unrealized gains, while those who had lost money in their trades will have their losses waived. "Nftperp stealing profits from winner [unrealized profit and loss] to backstop losers UPNL is insane to me", wrote one commenter. Another wrote, "If anyone else is considering NFT perps, please have the 'what happens when the illiquid market goes to zero overnight' plans clearly in place from the beginning."

Not to be deterred, the team is already preparing to launch a "v2". May it go as well as their first attempt.

Trader loses $213,000 to phishing scam, blames Twitter

Twitter reply by an account called "@burntteoast", advertising a link to a supposed "Doodles 2" projectDoodles scam (attribution)
Crypto personality LoveMake.eth wrote a Twitter thread about how they fell victim to a phishing scam in which an account appearing to belong to the cofounder of the popular Doodles NFT project advertised a fake project in the replies to a thread by a real cofounder. The Twitter account appeared to be Doodles' cofounder burnttoast, but the handle was actually burntteoast. LoveMake connected their primary wallet, which was immediately drained of 61.5 ETH (~$120,000) and $93,400 in the Tether stablecoin.

LoveMake wrote on Twitter that "I am dyslexic and didn't notice that the Burnt Toast acc was scam. It was very similar to the original & Verified." They appeared to blame Twitter's new verification process, writing, "@Twittersupport can you explain the meaning of the word 'verified'? we're waiting for days every time we change pfp or display name and then I got scammed by verified account with exact the same name and pfp as Doodles founder in million views thread?"

Several days later, they posted a thread again criticizing the prevalence of crypto scammers on Twitter. "I put millions $ into web3 projects, with over 90k$ into Twitter ads. I was rugged many times and finally robbed but not broken. Thanks to twitter the most profitable web3 activity now is a scam. Shouldn't Twitter pay more attention to its own security?"

Angry over the Azuki Elementals fiasco, Azuki holders form a DAO and immediately get exploited

After paying nearly $40 million for a new set of Azuki NFTs, the Azuki community is pissed that they were "dilutive" near-copies of the original Azuki collection. To fight back against the perceived "blatant scamming" by the Azuki creators, holders claiming to have collectively spent millions on Azuki projects formed an Azuki DAO. The DAO created a governance token, $BEAN, which it distributed to Azuki NFT owners. The DAO then embarked on a vote to hire a lawyer, sue Azuki's creator, and demand a refund of the 20,000 ETH (~$38 million) collectively spent on Elementals NFTs.

However, shortly after the DAO was created, the governance token was exploited. Attackers were able to take advantage of a flaw in the smart contract, with two exploiters stealing around 35 ETH (~$69,000). The DAO paused the contract to prevent further thefts.

File this one under "adding insult to injury".

Encryption AI rug pulls for $2 million, developer allegedly blames gambling addiction

A project called "Encryption AI" promised a Telegram bot that would provide a "secure and efficient way to launch tokens". People poured in around $2 million before the developer suddenly withdrew all the funds, crashing the token price by 99%.

The developer reportedly posted a message to Telegram, apologizing for taking the funds. "I must confess that I have fallen into a severe addiction to online gambling and casinos," the developer reportedly wrote. "Despite being only 22 years old, I have struggled to overcome this addiction, and unfortunately, I have lost nearly $300,000 over the past few months, including after the launch of [Encryption AI]."

They added, "Although I cannot guarantee when or if I will be able to make amends and relaunch [Encryption AI], I promise that I will make every effort to become a better person." Oh, well, in that case.

Poly Network exploited again

The name Poly Network may ring a bell, because in August 2021 they were exploited for an (at the time) record-setting $611 million.

Now, it's happened again, and some reports are throwing around even more massive numbers like $42 billion. In reality, the exploiters were able to mint massive quantities of tokens on multiple networks, with their wallet balances showing numbers in the billions. However, complete lack of liquidity for these tokens meant their "billions" are worth substantially less.

According to crypto research firm Beosin, the attackers have so far cashed out around 5,196 ETH (~$10.1 million) in liquid assets. Poly Network suspended services shortly after the attack.

Kraken ordered to turn over user information to U.S. tax investigators

Bad news for wealthy crypto traders on Kraken, who previously might have hoped to evade paying taxes on their past crypto trades. A judge has ordered the exchange to turn over information to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service on users who engaged in at least $20,000 in trades in any year between 2016 and 2020.

Although Kraken argued against the order, describing it as an "unjustified treasure hunt", the judge determined that the IRS was justified in its request, and ordered Kraken to cough up the records. The IRS alleged that although the exchange has more than 4 million users, and has processed $140 billion in trades since its inception in 2011, only 288,330 of those users have filed tax returns.

Huobi patches massive vulnerability after researcher allegedly tries for a year to disclose it

After the Huobi crypto exchange (finally) fixed a massive vulnerability, researcher Aaron Phillips published a blog post explaining what he had found. According to Phillips, two years ago, the exchange accidentally published a file containing Amazon Web Services (AWS) credentials, which could have allowed a bad actor to modify content on their websites and in their CDN, distribute malicious versions of their Android app, access user data and "whale reports" on high-value users, access OTC trade records and user data for OTC traders, and "carry out the largest crypto theft in history". "I had full control over data from almost every aspect of Huobi's business," wrote Phillips.

According to Phillips, it took months before he was able to get in touch with Huobi and convince them to act on the leak. Phillips first notified Huobi of the leak in June 2022, and after repeated efforts to contact the company, the credentials were only revoked in June 2023.

Huobi has tried to downplay the hack, first stating that the user data leak was "on a small scale (4,960 individuals)" and "does not involve sensitive information and does not affect user accounts and fund security". They also claimed the leaked OTC data was test data. "The log shows that only [Phillips] has downloaded, and [Phillips] has also stated that he has deleted. Therefore no leakage is actually caused," they wrote.

According to CoinGecko, Huobi is the seventeenth-largest cryptocurrency exchange by volume.

Cardinal Labs shuts down

A little less than a year after raising $4.4 million in seed funding to build a Solana NFT protocol that allowed for NFT rentals and other such things, Cardinal Labs has announced they're shutting down.

"Product market fit continues to be difficult to find, and the reality is that members of our team are feeling the itch to explore other pursuits," they wrote. "We’d hoped that by now the rest of the world’s industries would have begun adopting blockchain tech at a larger scale, but that still feels a ways away."

Azuki community pays $38 million for recycled artwork that immediately drops in value

Two NFTs side-by side. Both depict anime style women, in profile, with long pink hair and a weapon over their shoulder, with a flower in their hair.Azuki and Azuki Elementals NFTs (attribution)
The blue-chip "Azuki" NFT brand opened sales on June 27 for its latest NFT collection, a 20,000-piece project called "Elementals". Eager to get in on the Azuki action, people snapped up the 2 ETH (~$3,750) NFTs, netting Azuki 20,000 ETH (~$38 million) in primary sales alone. All NFTs were sold in the presale, meaning only existing holders of Azuki NFTs were able to buy in to the new project. As is somewhat common, the artwork itself was not visible prior to sales, meaning people bought the NFTs without knowing what they would look like until the art was revealed.

The mint itself was plagued with issues, with many collectors complaining they weren't able to buy NFTs due to technical difficulties. A team member apologized for the issues, writing that they were "gutted over what happened" but that "we have an amazing reveal experienced planned that will kick off soon".

When the reveal happened, people were disappointed to say the least. They expected a unique look that would not "dilute" the value of the original Azuki collection, and were met with what many feel is a low-effort clone of the original Azukis. Some observed NFTs in the Elementals collection that appeared to be direct duplicates of ones in the original collection, which Azuki later wrote was a "technical glitch" that was quickly corrected. The floor price of the Elemental NFTs, as well as those of other Azuki projects, immediately suffered. While people paid 2 ETH for the NFTs, they're now going for 1.5 ETH (~$2,825) at floor, a 0.5 ETH (~$925) loss. The floor price of the original Azuki collection tanked from ~15 ETH (~$28,200) to ~9 ETH (~$16,920), a 6 ETH ($11,280) loss.

Azuki wrote an apologetic thread on Twitter, writing that they had "missed the mark... the mint process was hectic, the PFPs feel similar and, even worse, dilutive to Azuki." Perhaps they will wipe their tears with some of the 20,000 ETH they're sitting on.

Themis Protocol hacked shortly after going live

Themis Protocol is a lending platform that has had somewhat of an excruciating rollout, with users waiting ever longer for the platform to finally go live as they endured multiphased airdrops but no usable product. On June 16, the project finally launched in beta on Arbitrum, an Ethereum layer 2.

Only eleven days later, on June 27, the team boasted that the project "has grown to over $1m TVL in 2 working days". An hour after that, they announced that they would be suspending the protocol and beginning an immediate investigation into an apparent theft. Themis boasts in its documentation that "security is the highest priority" of the project, and lists multiple audits from PeckShield.

An attacker was apparently able to exploit the project, draining around 220 Themis-wrapped ETH (nominally worth ~$417,000). Due to liquidity issues, they could only swap these for around 94 ETH (~$178,000) and almost $190,000 in stablecoins, for a total haul of around $368,000.

Chibi Finance rug pulls for $1 million

Chibi Finance was a defi project built on the Arbitrum Ethereum layer 2 network. Its Twitter bio described the project as "ChibiVerse For Chads, by Chibis. Compound dem yields!" What's not to love.

On June 27, the developers set the governance role to a malicious smart contract, which used a "panic" function to withdraw funds from the Chibi project. They then quickly swapped the funds to 555 wETH (~$1.05 million), bridged them to the Ethereum main chain, and laundered them through Tornado Cash.

Chibi Finance has since deleted its website and Twitter profile. Meanwhile, some crypto influencers who had promoted the project caught heat for doing so.

Prime Trust placed into receivership

Nevada's Financial Institutions Division and the Prime Trust crypto custodian requested that Prime Trust be placed into receivership, according to the NFID. A week earlier, the NFID had issued a cease and desist, ordering Prime Trust to halt operations and alleging that the company was insolvent.

In the filing, NFID alleges that Prime Trust discovered in December 2021 that it couldn't access some customer wallets, and so "purchased additional digital currency using customer money from its omnibus customer accounts" in order to satisfy withdrawals from said wallets.

Prime Trust reportedly has liabilities of around $82.8 million in fiat currency, plus another $860,000 of digital asset-denominated liabilities. "[Prime Trust] is in an unsafe financial condition and/or is insolvent. Additionally, [Prime Trust's] condition will only progressively worsen as customers continue to withdraw," wrote the regulator.

Eco-travel company We Are Bamboo loses millions of customer funds gambling on crypto

New Zealand-based We Are Bamboo may have been an ethical travel company, but they certainly weren't an ethical handler of customer funds. In late October 2022, the company abruptly announced it would be closing up its eco-travel business — without refunding customer funds due to the force majeure clause of the contract.

Now, a report from the New Zealand Herald suggests that the company's director Colin Salisbury took more than NZ$3.24 million (~US$2 million) in customer funds, put it into multiple cryptocurrency platforms over a period of almost two years, and lost it all. Another ~US$800,000 was lost in at least four fraudulent crypto platforms which just "ceased to exist".

We Are Bamboo tried to blame the collapse of their business on the COVID-19 pandemic and on a group of customers whose "actions and online influence have broken us". "Our intentions here are not to play the victim but simply share with you the levels to which this group has gone to ensure our downfall, and made it their sole purpose to attack us, our families, our staff, and our customers with the intent to destroy Bamboo," they wrote. However, a liquidator in the We Are Bamboo bankruptcy says they discovered the cryptocurrency transactions, which explained the true demise of the company.

Salisbury reportedly engaged in the crypto trading because he was concerned that the US dollar might lose value. Guess he found out the hard way what crypto could do for the value of his customers' funds.

Former NRL star and convict Jarryd Hayne reportedly loses more than $500,000 to a Bitcoin scam run by fellow inmate

Photograph of Jarryd HayneJarryd Hayne (attribution)
Quick tip: if you're in jail and a fellow inmate who is serving twelve years for running a Ponzi scheme asks you to invest in a Bitcoin scheme, don't do it. Then again, on the list of "things Jarryd Hayne shouldn't have done", this ranks fairly low.

Jarryd Hayne is a convicted rapist once known for his careers in rugby league and, briefly, American football. He's serving several years in jail, after being convicted of rape, winning an appeal, being retried, and once again being found guilty.

Hayne is one of several inmates apparently convinced by the Ponzi schemer inmate, Ishan Seenar Sappidee, that he could make them massive returns. Hayne provided around AU$780,000 (~US$521,000) in Bitcoin to the enterprising inmate, who apparently amassed more than AU$2 million (~US$1.3 million)from at least seven inmates.

Alleged SpireBit crypto scam loses one senior his life savings

According to a report from NPR, a crypto investment scam called SpireBit drained the life savings of a 74-year-old man in California. The scheme followed a familiar pattern: an online ad followed by some personalized recruiting convinced the man to put a relatively modest sum into an online account with a platform supposedly showing his crypto investments. After seeing those investments skyrocket, the man was convinced to put in more and more money, seeing massive returns. Only once he had put in his life savings did he try to withdraw, and discovered he could not. Ultimately, he realized the platform was a sham.

SpireBit claimed to be partnered with established companies within and outside of the crypto ecosystem, and took on the name of a real company as its supposed "parent" firm. Its online footprint was convincing at a glance, but a little digging revealed LinkedIn profiles using stock photos as portraits.

After NPR began poking around, the UK's Financial Conduct Authority issued a warning that SpireBit "is an unauthorised firm that uses the details of a genuine FCA-regulated firm when offering products and services. This makes the unauthorised firm appear as if it is regulated."

NPR could not determine how many people had fallen for the scheme, or how much money had been lost in total.

Binance ordered to halt operations in Belgium

Belgium's Financial Services and Markets Authority alleged on June 2023 is violating prohibitions against "offering and providing exchange services in Belgium between virtual currencies and legal currencies, as well as custody wallet services, from countries that are not members of the European Economic Area". The regulator ordered Binance to immediately stop providing "any and all such services" in the country.

The regulator also demanded Binance return all crypto assets to customers, or transfer them to a company authorized in Belgium. They also noted that "The Crown Prosecutor of Brussels has been informed of the acts that are liable to constitute a criminal offence."

$1.25 million stolen in 2 months in Polygon NFT phishing scheme

A phishing scam in which scammers airdropped fake NFTs impersonating real projects has landed the scammers around $1.25 million in the last two months. The scammers have created more than 1,350 fake NFTs appearing to come from real projects including RocketPool, ApeCoin, Polygon, Uniswap, and Aave, then airdropped them to more than 500,000 wallets. When they viewed the NFTs, the victims were directed to phishing sites where they signed malicious signatures.

Around $1.25 million in various assets have been stolen thus far, with the largest single loss exceeding $150,000.

Former Home Improvement child star Zachery Ty Bryan accused of crypto scamming

Headshot of Zachery Ty BryanZachery Ty Bryan (attribution)
What is it with former child stars and the siren song of crypto? Zachery Ty Bryan, who played Brad on the sitcom Home Improvement in the 90s, got rich when he used his earnings to buy in early to Bitcoin thanks to a tip from fellow child star-turned-crypto-mogul, Brock Pierce. Then, he got into selling fake tokens that he said were connected to an agricultural scheme called "Producers Market", which promised to help farmers by "connecting farmers and makers directly to you".

The project was real, and they had in fact brought on Bryan as an advisor and investor. Bryan later stated in a YouTube video that he had "[taken] the majority of my Bitcoin and rolled it into this technology". However, the firm scrapped its plans for an initial coin offering in 2019. Despite this, Bryan continued pitching the ICO to friends and family with the promise of big returns. One investor, a college student, he reeled in after matching with her on the dating app Bumble. Various sources told The Hollywood Reporter they'd lost between $5,000 and $25,000, for a total of almost $50,000.

In October 2020, Producers Market cut ties with Bryan. This coincided with Bryan being arrested for felony strangulation and other charges in regards to a drunken assault on a girlfriend, which he later pled down to misdemeanor menacing and fourth-degree assault.

Ponzi scheme promising a blockchain app to identify dogs by their nose-prints scams investors out of $127 million

A company that promised an app that could identify dogs by their nose-prints — built on the blockchain, of course — has been alleged by South Korean police to be "a typical Ponzi scheme" that lured investors with promises of up to 150% returns in 100 days. The company raised around ₩166.4 billion (~$127 million) from approximately 22,000 people. The victims, according to Korean police, are mostly "in their 60s or older with no expertise in cryptocurrencies".

As for the noseprint reader, well, it was found to be a fake product that (shockingly) didn't use a blockchain at all. The company had also promised to build "theme parks for pets", but had not leased any of the sites it had identified.

Prime Trust is insolvent

The Nevada Financial Institutions Division issued a cease and desist to the Prime Trust crypto custodian. Earlier in the month, the apparently embattled Prime Trust signed a non-binding letter of intent of acquisition with BitGo, but BitGo announced the deal was off on June 22. The same day, Stably announced that they had received a letter from Prime Trust announcing that deposits and withdrawals would be halted, which attributed the move to an order from the NFID.

Now, the cease and desist, filed June 21, has become public. It alleges that "the overall financial condition of [Prime Trust] has considerably deteriorated to a critically deficient level" and that "On or about June 21, 2023, Respondent was unable to honor customer withdrawals due to a shortfall of customer funds". The NFID alleged that Prime Trust "has materially and willfully breached its fiduciary duties to its customers by failing to safeguard assets under its custody and is unable to meet all customer disbursement requests."

Prime Trust had been a partner of the TrueUSD stablecoin, which halted minting on June 10 for undisclosed reasons.

Prime Trust halts withdrawals as acquisition falls through

The planned acquisition by BitGo of the Prime Trust crypto custodian fell through on June 22, as BitGo announced that they had "made the hard decision to terminate its acquisition" after "considerable effort and work to find a path forward". BitGo had announced its intention to acquire Prime Trust on June 8.

Shortly after BitGo's announcement, Prime Trust client Stably announced that they had received a letter from Prime Trust announcing that deposits and withdrawals would be halted. Prime Trust stated that the halt was by order of the Nevada Financial Institution Division, which had been issued the previous day.

Web3 influencer Elena tries to sell NFT collection of stolen art

Pixel art of three test tubes containing green, pink, and gold liquid on a dark purple background. On the right is a screenshot of identical pixel art from vecteezy.com Atomic Ordinals NFT on left; source of stolen artwork on right (attribution)
Web3 influencer Elena announced she would be launching an NFT collection titled "Atomic Ordinals", which would be inscribed on the Bitcoin blockchain. She claimed that the 200 images "fus[ed] my love for medicine and artistic expression fueled by a passion for emerging tech and education." She wrote, "I've spent countless hours pouring my heart and soul into each piece 🥺" The NFTs were set to mint for 0.05 BTC, meaning the collection would have earned her around 10 BTC ($300,000) if it minted out.

As it turned out, Elena had actually directly copied the pixel art from various sources. When accused of copying it, she published a screen capture video claiming to show that she had created the artwork "pixel by pixel", but people were quickly able to find the true sources of the artwork.

Eventually, she came as close to an admission as she is apparently going to get in an announcement that she would be pausing the sale: "I have heard your concerns about the art and I will be working to fix the file quality and any images that might be seen as 'copied' as they were only retraces and I never had any ill intent whatsoever."

Binance cancels registration in the United Kingdom

Binance's footprint is shrinking even further, as the company has canceled its registration with the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This means that the company will not be able to perform any regulated activities in the country.

Binance had applied for registration after being warned by the FCA in July 2021 to seek registration before launching its business in the region.

Since the beginning of June, Binance has also announced it will exit the Netherlands and Cyprus amid regulatory issues.

Financial Times alleges Crypto.com is trading against its own customers

A report out of the Financial Times alleges that the Singapore-based Crypto.com exchange runs proprietary trading and market making teams. This is a controversial activity — though not uncommon in the crypto world — because of the conflicts of interest that are introduced when these functions are combined with those of an exchange. Speaking to CNBC about similar activities by other exchanges, US SEC chair Gary Gensler said, "These trading platforms, they call themselves exchanges, are commingling a number of functions. In traditional finance, we don't see the New York Stock Exchange also operating a hedge fund, making markets."

Sources cited by the FT allege that Crypto.com made "absolutely dramatic sworn statements that Crypto.com was in no way involved in trading" to other trading houses, and claim that employees were asked to lie about the existence of internal market makers. Crypto.com has refuted these allegations, and acknowledged that they run a market maker.

"This is not a controversial practice," Crypto.com said about the controversial practice.

Machi Big Brother sues zachxbt

A grey outline of a penguin with four eyes, on a black backgroundzachxbt's avatar (attribution)
Crypto personality and creator of C.R.E.A.M. Finance Jeffrey Huang, aka "Machi Big Brother", has filed a defamation lawsuit against crypto sleuth zachxbt. Huang alleges that zachxbt has defamed Huang with false claims via a Medium article that accuses Huang of multiple pump-and-dump schemes that enriched Huang to the tune of 22,000 ETH (~$38 million at today's prices).

Huang is also annoyed at zachxbt's observations about the multiple hacks of C.R.E.A.M. Finance, which zachxbt wrote had been exploited three times "due to negligence". "Putting aside that Cream Finance was exploited two, not three times", Huang hilariously writes in the lawsuit, taking issue with the fact that zachxbt supposedly intentionally omitted that some funds were returned and that Huang claims to have been no longer involved with the project by that point. It's not made clear in the lawsuit which of the three hacks recorded on Web3 is Going Just Great — to the tune of $37.5 million (February 2021), $25–30 million (August 2021), and $130 million (October 27, 2021) — supposedly didn't happen.

Wyre finally shuts down

The crypto payments platform Wyre finally announced they would be winding down "due to market conditions". This came after a January announcement from the CEO, where it was not entirely clear whether the company was shutting down or just massively "scaling back".

Wyre had been a partner of Binance US, through which Binance was able to accept USD deposits. However, Binance US is now the target of SEC regulatory action, and has suspended US dollar deposits. Wyre wrote in their announcement that the closure "is not due to any regulatory agency direction". Sure thing.

Binance to leave the Netherlands after failing to obtain license

As they are wont to do, Binance set up shop in the Netherlands without getting permission from the country's regulators. However, after being warned and then fined €3.3 million (~$3.35 million) in January, they apparently finally decided it was time to try to comply with requirements.

Sadly for them, they were unable to obtain a VASP registration in the country, and their "many alternative avenues to service Dutch residents in compliance with Dutch regulations" didn't pan out either. They announced that, effective immediately, they would no longer be accepting new customers from the region. Existing customers in the country will soon be only able to withdraw assets, and will not be able to purchase assets or trade on the platform.

Binance US cuts staff following SEC lawsuit

The US arm of Binance has cut around 50 positions, amounting to approximately 10% of its US employees. In a message to employees, Binance.US CEO Brian Shroder explained, "Because of our preparation for a prolonged and very costly legal battle, the Board asked Management to right-size our organization and reduce our burn rate to ensure long-term viability".

Shroder is, of course, referring to the recent lawsuit from the SEC as well as a lawsuit from the CFTC that was filed in March.

Binance looks to exit Cyprus

Although Binance's Cyprus arm was only registered in October 2022, the company is already looking to deregister in the country. According to Binance, they're pulling back in smaller EU countries in order to "focus on our efforts on fewer regulated entities in the EU", where they will need to come into compliance with the recent MiCA legislation by the time it comes into effect.

CoinEx settles with New York for $1.7 million

The Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange CoinEx has agreed to pay $1.17 million in refunds to investors and $600,000 in penalties for failing to register as a securities and commodities broker-dealer and for falsely representing itself as a crypto exchange. The lawsuit was initially filed in February, and alleged that the company "engaged in repeated and persistent fraudulent practices".

The company is also banned from operating in the state going forward. The agreement requires CoinEx to implement geoblocking to prevent people with New York IP addresses from accessing the platform, and prohibits the company from creating new accounts for US customers or allowing US customers to do anything other than withdraw their assets.

FPG halts withdrawals after $15–20 million hack

The institutional cryptocurrency broker Floating Point Group (FPG) announced to customers on June 14 that they would be suspending all activity on their platform following a "cyber security incident" that had occurred on June 11. "While the loss at this point is still being investigated and analyzed, the number as we understand it today is between $15M-$20M in cryptocurrencies lost," they wrote on Twitter.

The group announced that they were working with "the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, our regulators and Chainalysis" to investigate the attack. The group had previously earned SOC 2 certification for its cybersecurity controls.

Texas securities regulator alleges in cease-and-desist that Abra crypto lender has been insolvent for months

In an emergency cease-and-desist issued on June 15, the Texas State Securities Board alleged that the Abra crypto lending firm was "insolvent or nearly insolvent" as of interviews conducted on March 31. The filing alleged that Abra and its founder William Barhydt had made investment offerings that were materially misleading, accusing them of securities fraud. Despite not contesting securities regulators' conclusion that Abra was insolvent, Abra repeatedly posted statements on social media such as the one on June 11, where they wrote "Abra is not bankrupt".

According to the complaint, although Abra claimed it stored customer funds with the Fireblocks crypto custodian, they had actually been "secretly transferring assets" to Binance.

The regulator also alleged that Abra had around $30 million in assets with Babel Finance, $30 million with Genesis, and $10 million with Three Arrows Capital — three companies in various stages of liquidation or bankruptcy. They also have $8.8 million with Auros, a firm that was in liquidation but has since exited the process.

Delio crypto lender suspends withdrawals

South Korean cryptocurrency lending platform Delio announced to its customers on June 14 that they would be suspending withdrawals. In a letter to customers, they wrote that the decision was taken in response to the withdrawal suspension by Korean yield platform Haru Invest the previous day, which they said had led to a "sharp increase in market volatility and increased confusion among investors". Haru's suspension had caused a "sudden surge of withdrawals on our end", said Delio CEO James Jung.

Delio, like Haru, advertised yields of more than 10%.