...and is definitely not an enormous grift that's pouring lighter fluid on our already smoldering planet.
Created by Molly White. Subscribe to her newsletter for weekly recaps.
Terms of the settlement include 100% repayment of investments made by victims in the five states that settled: Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, and Georgia.
GS Partners has also faced regulatory scrutiny in other US states, as well as in Canada, Australia, and South Africa.
This $10 million was later sent to a German non-profit foundation called the Wau Holland Foundation, which has also been fundraising and managing funds relating to Assange's legal defense. However, this transfer raised serious concerns among some members of the DAO who say they've effectively been cut out of decisionmaking, that the funds were transferred without their approval, and allege the treasury was mismanaged and crashed in value as a result.
Hacktivist, bitcoin core developer, and AssangeDAO organizer Amir Taaki accused fellow AssangeDAO organizer: "Harry Halpin you should be honest and direct with the people here. You believe the money should be kept in a foundation controlled by your people with Julian. You do not respect the community or believe in the DAO."
The project spiked in popularity when it launched in August 2023, but interest rapidly dwindled. A token launched in May 2024 also suffered a mostly downward trajectory. On September 7, the team reassigned ownership and admin rights to the smart contracts to the burn address, making them permanently inaccessible.
Some denounced the project as a Ponzi scheme (repeating accusations it has received since its inception, based on its incentive structure). Others accused the development team of rug pulling and not delivering on their promises — accusations that intensified as one co-founder deleted his Twitter account and the other set his to private. The team is estimated to have made around $44 to $60 million in fees.
He went on to state that the "vast majority" of the stolen assets were his personal funds. He also alleged that "There is some evidence to suggest that someone in the Ventures syndicate is either part of the group, or passing information onto them."
The amount of funds stolen was not disclosed. Drakon resigned as CEO, and said that he had forfeited his interest in Revolo Intel "to facilitate the return of some money back to members as quickly as possible". He wrote: "To be clear, I have zero financial interest in Revelo moving forward."
He also stated that he would be "stepping away from 'public life' in this space", and warned others: "If you are someone who is known to control large sums of money, you are a target and it is not difficult at all to get to you."
In addition to the fine, terms of the settlement require the platform to allow its customers to withdraw their crypto assets, and to update disclosures regarding asset custody.
The California DOJ also accused the platform of misleading its customers by claiming that the app "advertis[ed] it would connect to multiple trading venues, to ensure customers receive the most competitive prices between the venues, which was not always true". They also say that Robinhood lied about always holding all customer crypto assets purchased through the platform, when in reality, "there were instances in which it arranged for trading venues to hold customer assets for extended periods".
The posts were deleted and accounts were locked down very quickly by Twitter, but not before approximately 2,000 people bought around $1.8 million of the fake token.
The team behind Pendle (the platform on which Pendie is built) detected the attack and paused Pendle an hour after the attack began, which they claim prevented another $105 million from being stolen.
Members of the Penpie team filed complaints with Singaporean police and the US FBI. They also attempted to negotiate a "bug bounty" via on-chain and social media messages to the attacker, but the hacker seems uninterested and has continued to transfer funds between various crypto wallets and launder funds through Tornado Cash.
The SEC also charged that Galois Capital had misled some investors into believing they needed five business days of notice to redeem assets, while other investors were allowed to redeem assets more quickly.
Galois agreed to a settlement with the SEC in which they will pay a $225,000 penalty, which will go to investors who lost money.
An exploiter was able to take advantage of an arbitrary call error that allowed them to steal funds from these various contracts, amounting to around $56,000. Various people associated with Aave emphasized that there was no risk to user funds or flaw in the core Aave protocol, and one described the hack as "raiding the tip jar".
Finzer promised that the company would vigorously fight any impending lawsuit.
The lawsuit echoes previous enforcement actions by the SEC, such as a September 2023 settlement with the celebrity-backed Stoner Cats project, in which the SEC suggested that it may broadly view NFTs as securities if investors "reasonably expect to profit" from the continued efforts of those who release the NFTs.
No JavaScript? That's cool too! Check out the Web 1.0 version of the site to see more entries.
