Digital Currency Group settles with the SEC for $38 million over misleading statements surrounding Genesis collapse

The Digital Currency Group has agreed to settle with the SEC for $38 million over charges that its Genesis subsidiary misled investors. When the hedge fund Three Arrows Capital blew up and defaulted on a margin call in June 2022, DCG publicly downplayed the fact that their entire business was at risk, and overstated its ability to bail out the Genesis subsidiary by taking on its liabilities and doing some weird accounting maneuvering involving a $1.1 billion promissory note. In November, with further crypto market turmoil, Genesis could no longer meet withdrawal requests and collapsed. The company filed for bankruptcy the following January.

MakersPlace NFT marketplace shuts down

Citing "ongoing market challenges and funding difficulties", the MakersPlace NFT platform announced it will be shutting down after six years of operations. The company had raised $30 million in funding in August 2021 from investors including Eminem, Sony Music, and Coinbase Ventures.

They wrote in their announcement that, although they had some money left, the "prolonged downturn" in the NFT market was causing them to "anticipate significant challenges in securing further investment which would make it difficult". They said they would be returning unused funding to investors and shutting down most of the site's functionality immediately.

BitMEX fined additional $100 million for regulatory violations

Although BitMEX had previously tried to argue that they should not face additional penalties after being fined $110 million in 2024 for Bank Secrecy Act violations, a judge has disagreed. BitMEX pleaded guilty to failing to implement an adequate anti-money laundering program, as required by US regulations. During the five-year period of "willful" non-compliance, the firm allegedly drew $1.3 billion in revenues.

BitMEX was not supposed to serve US customers, yet Americans made up around 11.5% of their customers. "BITMEX policies nominally in place to prevent such trading were toothless or easily overridden to serve BITMEX's bottom line goal of obtaining revenue through the U.S. market without regard to U.S. criminal laws," alleged a press release by the US Attorney's Office of the Southern District of New York. They added: "Corporate executives took affirmative steps purportedly designed to exempt BITMEX from the application of U.S. laws like AML and KYC requirements, despite knowing of BITMEX's obligation to implement such programs by operating in the U.S. As part of BITMEX's willful evasion of U.S. AML laws, the company lied to a bank about the purpose and nature of a subsidiary to allow BITMEX to pump millions of dollars through the U.S. financial system."

The Idols NFT loses $324,000 to exploit

An illustration of a young-looking human wearing silver armor and a blue toga, with a silver tiara, long brown hair, and blue markings on their faceIdol #1295 (attribution)
An attacker noticed a vulnerability in a smart contract for The Idols, an NFT project that also incorporates ETH staking functionality. They discovered that a function used to distribute rewards had a bug when the sender and recipient addresses were the same, allowing a holder to repeatedly claim rewards. By taking advantage of this bug, they were able to siphon 97 stETH (~$324,000) from the project.

Although The Idols boasts of two audits from several years ago, the contract containing the vulnerability may not have been audited.

Sony accused of "rugging" after freezing IP infringing memecoins on their Soneium blockchain

[person 1]
yeah the two meme tokens that everyone was excited about seem to be blacklisted now

[person 2]
0xea4E0CfF21Ea0a1650B658AAf5142720195245bB   Is this what the team members do?

[person 3]
aibo now forbidden on explorer...

[person 4]
I just wanted a cute robot dog koin?

[person 5]
Why are you honeypotting coins lol

[person 1]
this is very bad vibes

[person 2]
A disastrous beginning

[person 1]
obviously not end-of-the-world but people bridged to Soneium to ape new memecoins and seeing themselves get locked out and rugged in real timeChats from the Soneium Discord (attribution)
Only hours after Sony launched its "Soneium" layer-2 Ethereum blockchain, the company was accused of "rugging" people who had purchased various memecoins launched on Soneium when it began prohibiting their trading. The two tokens, now listed as "forbidden" for trading, were based on Sony products. One, "Aibo", was themed around a series of robotic dog toys. The other, "Toro", was based on Sony's unofficial Toro Inoue mascot.

Sony's crackdown on these tokens perhaps should not have come as a huge surprise, given that the announcement of Soneium's launch touted "protecting content rights and creating fair profit-sharing mechanisms" among its goals.

Nevertheless, members of the Soneium Discord widely accused Sony of "rugging" or "honeypotting" them by prohibiting trading on the memecoins they had purchased.

Australian Open apparently scraps its NFT project

A rendering of a tennis ball with the "AO" logo on itAO Art Ball #892 (attribution)
Holders of any of the several thousand "AO ArtBall" NFTs may be disappointed as the Australian Open appears to have abandoned the project aimed at tennis fans. The first NFTs originally sold for 0.067 ETH (~$275 at the time), and another round were minted for 0.23 ETH (~$450 at the time). However, the sale prices of the NFTs have steadily dwindled since early 2023, and recent sales have been for 0.003 to 0.0075 ETH (~$10–$25).

Buyers were told they could use the NFTs as a sort of fan pass, receiving access to a Discord, and earning ground passes and behind-the-scenes access for finals weeks. There was also a scheme in which NFT holders could redeem access to passes to matches.

However, the Australian Open seems to have let the project — launched at the peak of NFT hype — peter out, with no mention of redeeming passes, and project websites still promising a 2024 update. The Discord has been shut down.

UniLend exploited for almost $200,000

The UniLend project, which advertises itself as a "unified platform for all things AI and defi", was exploited for almost $200,000. An attacker was able to take advantage of a bug in a smart contract that handled token redemption.

UniLend acknowledged the hack, downplaying it as affecting "only" 4% of the platform's $4.7 million TVL. They offered a bounty to the attacker.

Bankless hosts slammed for dumping tokens

Bankless hosts Ryan Sean Adams, David Hoffman, and ejaaz on a video stream also containing the Bankless logo and a sponsorship logo for MantleBankless hosts Ryan Sean Adams, David Hoffman, and ejaaz (clockwise from top left) (attribution)
The hosts of the Bankless crypto podcast have landed in hot water after selling off some of the substantial quantities of $AICC tokens they were allocated as investors in the project. The $AICC project was launched by ejaaz, a co-host on an affiliated Bankless podcast, and had been promoted on Bankless shows. Each co-host received 9 million $AICC tokens in exchange for their 5 SOL (~$950) investments. The brand's venture capital arm, Bankless VC, also invested 2 SOL (~$380) and received a 3.64 million token allocation.

Shortly after the token's public launch, Bankless VC dumped 300,000 AICC (8% of their allocation) for 344 SOL ($65,300). By immediately dumping tokens on retail when the token opened for public trading, they were able to sell the tokens for an average of $0.22 — considerably higher than the $0.05 to $0.11 the token has been trading at over the last 24 hours.

When questioned about the trades, Bankless host David Hoffmann wrote: "Agree that Bankless Ventures should not be selling tokens - that was an impulsive mistake." He announced that they had repurchased the tokens they had sold, and were "discussing a self-imposed vesting schedule" for selling tokens that they themselves had promoted.

They later posted a long apology in their Discord, blaming the sales on Ben Lakoff, a general partner of Bankless VC. "Ben did not have context for this, and was in the mindset of trading a local high as you might trade a meme coin you're bullish on - or there's no way he would have done this - huge mistake, first time something like this has happened - he's devastated", explained Bankless co-host Ryan Sean Adams. He also placed some blame on AICC for not imposing any token lockups or vesting schedule that would prohibit early investors from dumping tokens on retail.

$2.2 million stolen by fake job scammers

Wish Online Support

I understand so if no other option then I have no solution to resolve. I only have until Monday to find the money and resolve the account or I will lose the money on my account?
My trainer was giving me false hope saying the most he ever had to deposit was $7k. I was not aware of such high money needed
Bad information leads to me losing money I guess
Please send me 7k usdt and I will cut my loses on the rest. I have no way to resolve the account. I need the money back to live on and buy my family food 

Reply: Firstly, I want to make it clear to you that your funds will remain in your account until the transaction is completed. They will not be lost or disappear, and this is something I can assure you of. 

How long will they remain in the account?

Reply: Your funds and current negative balance will remain on your account until you have completed them.
Reply: However, what I currently need to know is how long it will take for you to complete your account, so that I can better assist you in negotiating with the merchant. 
Reply: Because in the above information you have already mentioned to me that you need time toText messages between victim and scammer (attribution)
New York Attorney General Letitia James announced a lawsuit against a group of scammers operating a scheme in which they promised fake job opportunities to victims, convincing them they needed to first deposit cryptocurrency. Victims were told they would be generating review data for online products, but that they needed to maintain account balances equivalent or greater to the value of the products they were reviewing. They were then tricked into sending the cryptocurrency into digital wallets where they could be taken by the scammers. Those who tried to withdraw the assets were then scammed again, told they needed to pay a "blockchain verification fee" or "escrow fee".

One single victim was defrauded out of more than $100,000.

The NYAG has seized $2.2 million in Tether, and is pursuing legal action against the as-yet-unidentified scammers. Because of the unknown identities of the defendants, the NYAG will serve notice of the lawsuit via NFT — something they describe as a first by government regulators.

Moby Trade loses over $1 million to private key leak

The Moby Trade defi options protocol suffered a $1 million loss, narrowly avoiding the loss of another nearly $1.5 million. The project team stated that a hacker had "identified and exploited a vulnerability in the key management system" that was supposed to protect a private key used by the project. Using the private key, they were able to perform contract upgrades that then allowed them to drain about almost $1.1 million in wBTC, wETH, and USDC.

Another $1.47 million in assets were vulnerable as a result, but the whitehat blockchain security firm Seal911 successfully drained those funds to later be returned to the protocol once it was secured.

Orange Finance hacked

The Arbitrum-based liquidity management project Orange Finance suffered at least $840,000 in losses after hackers compromised the project's admin address, then used it to upgrade the project's smart contracts and transfer funds.

"The team is not sure what happened," wrote Orange Finance in a tweet announcing the hack, encouraging people to revoke contract approvals for the compromised addresses.

Orange Finance attempted to negotiate with the attacker via on-chain message, writing, "If you respond positively to our offer within 24 hours, we guarantee that no law enforcement agencies will be involved, and the matter will be treated as a white-hat hack."