The SEC also found that Tai Mo Shan had acted as a statuary underwriter for the Terra sister token Luna, which was an unregistered security.
Tai Mo Shan agreed to the fine, and to a prohibition on future violations of securities laws.
...and is definitely not an enormous grift that's pouring lighter fluid on our already smoldering planet.
Created by Molly White. Subscribe to her newsletter for weekly recaps.
The SEC also found that Tai Mo Shan had acted as a statuary underwriter for the Terra sister token Luna, which was an unregistered security.
Tai Mo Shan agreed to the fine, and to a prohibition on future violations of securities laws.
For example, a "Vault of Gems" NFT project falsely claimed to be the "first NFT pegged to a hard asset, like jewelry", which would have its own exchange. A "Faceless" NFT project promised to produce comic books, a movie, and a clothing company. None of the promises ever materialized, and Hay and Mayo abandoned the projects soon after launching them.
Hay and Mayo worked to hide their involvement with their scams, and have been charged with harassment for attempting to threaten those who connected them. In one case, after a person revealed Hay and Mayo to be the ones behind the Faceless NFT project, the duo sent threatening emails and text messages to the man and his parents. In an email to his parents, they impersonated a law firm, and even threatened to make false sexual abuse claims against the man.
The more than 1,100 customers lost more than US$5 million. While some of the customers were likely sophisticated investors, Kraken made no effort to limit the product to such a group. Around 81% of the customers who used Kraken's margin product lost money.
This is far from Kraken's first run-in with regulators. The company has settled with US regulators over sanctions violations and failure to comply with securities regulations pertaining to its staking product. They also have an open lawsuit from the US SEC over alleged unregistered securities offerings and commingling corporate and customer funds.
Some blamed the theft on an apparent malicious Ethereum transaction the user had signed nearly three years prior. However, while a malicious transaction signature on Ethereum could explain the NFT thefts, it should not alone enable the theft of assets on the separate bitcoin blockchain.
Despite this, Ledger blamed its customer, telling a media outlet that "As we know, the user got phished when it comes to the ETH wallet, we can assume user error on the BTC side too".
Despite his promises, Pinillo had created no trading platform whatsoever, was doing no crypto trading, and simply pocketed all the money. Any payments made to his customers during the fraud were taken from newer investors, in classic Ponzi fashion.
Clober has offered a 20% "bug bounty" to the exploiter vi on-chain message, though they have not yet received any public reply.
Then, when a new token called THENA was listed on Binance and experienced major volatility as trading opened, Alpaca's issues came to a head. As the token price surged, the slow oracle failed to reflect price changes, allowing people to withdraw far more THENA than they had posted as collateral. THENA lenders have lost an estimated $2.8 million.
On December 10, Alpaca Finance proposed distributing $50,000 "saved" by their liquidation bot to the lenders who had lost funds. Alpaca Finance also banned users complaining about their losses in the project Discord, dismissing them as a "group bot/FUD attack".
Police were unable to recover his money, although they did seize around 40 websites that were spoofing various real NFT marketplaces.
The token followed the typical pattern of quickly pumping, then crashing spectacularly, losing around 90% of its "value". This is often an indicator of a pump-and-dump scheme by insiders, but Welch vehemently denied such wrongdoing, blaming the crash on "snipers".
"I really lost $43k apeing in 'hawk tuah' coin," wrote one buyer on Twitter. Other Twitter users marveled at a wallet that swapped $1.4 million worth of MOODENG (a memecoin based on the tiny hippo of the same name) only to lose it all on the $HAWK token.
Malicious versions of the library allowed exploiters to steal private keys and drain funds from dApps like various Solana bots.
Around $184,000 was stolen as a result of the compromise. Although it was caught fairly quickly, and the malicious code was removed from package managers, developers will need to update projects that used the malicious version of the library, and refresh any potentially exposed secrets.
Although the $450,000 theft is relatively small compared to some other crypto hacks, it represented around 6% of the total value locked on Clipper. Clipper stated they were working to trace and attempt to recover funds, and asked the hacker to contact them to potentially negotiate a return of some funds.