They wrote in their announcement that, although they had some money left, the "prolonged downturn" in the NFT market was causing them to "anticipate significant challenges in securing further investment which would make it difficult". They said they would be returning unused funding to investors and shutting down most of the site's functionality immediately.
MakersPlace NFT marketplace shuts down
- "MakersPlace Announces Market Exit", MakersPlace
The Idols NFT loses $324,000 to exploit
Although The Idols boasts of two audits from several years ago, the contract containing the vulnerability may not have been audited.
- "The Idols NFT", Rekt [archive]
Australian Open apparently scraps its NFT project
Buyers were told they could use the NFTs as a sort of fan pass, receiving access to a Discord, and earning ground passes and behind-the-scenes access for finals weeks. There was also a scheme in which NFT holders could redeem access to passes to matches.
However, the Australian Open seems to have let the project — launched at the peak of NFT hype — peter out, with no mention of redeeming passes, and project websites still promising a 2024 update. The Discord has been shut down.
Two NFT fraudsters charged for rug pulls amounting to over $22 million
For example, a "Vault of Gems" NFT project falsely claimed to be the "first NFT pegged to a hard asset, like jewelry", which would have its own exchange. A "Faceless" NFT project promised to produce comic books, a movie, and a clothing company. None of the promises ever materialized, and Hay and Mayo abandoned the projects soon after launching them.
Hay and Mayo worked to hide their involvement with their scams, and have been charged with harassment for attempting to threaten those who connected them. In one case, after a person revealed Hay and Mayo to be the ones behind the Faceless NFT project, the duo sent threatening emails and text messages to the man and his parents. In an email to his parents, they impersonated a law firm, and even threatened to make false sexual abuse claims against the man.
- Indictment of Gabriel Hay and Gavin Mayo [archive]
85-year-old painter loses life savings to NFT art dealer scam
Police were unable to recover his money, although they did seize around 40 websites that were spoofing various real NFT marketplaces.
- "Brooklyn District Attorney Shuts Down 40 Domains Associated With NFT Crypto Scam Targeting Artists, After Brooklyn Painter Lost Over $135,00", "Kings County District Attorney's Office" [archive]
Nike to shut down its RTFKT "virtual sneakers" project
However, the "metaverse" trend failed to take off, and Nike is only the latest company to abandon its multi-million dollar investment in the space.
CryptoPunk sells for a fraction of its likely market price due to zombie smart contract
The platform's smart contracts remain operational, however, and so despite the lack of a frontend website for the platform, the backend still remains. A trader was able to use these smart contracts to trigger a feature that allows a buyout of the fractional shard holders which, if not countered by someone else, automatically goes through in 14 days. The bidder proposed a purchase of 0.001 ETH per share, and without an operational Niftex frontend, no one noticed. The bid went through, and the trader successfully purchased all 10,000 shares — and thus, the NFT — for 10 ETH.
Since then, several people have offered to purchase the NFT for amounts ranging from 100 to 605 ETH. If the new owner were to accept the 605 ETH bid, they would 60x their purchase price.
One owner of a fractionalized share said he thought he had managed to successfully block the sale, but miscalculated. "GG to the new owner", he wrote. He wrote on Twitter, "I don’t consider this a heist. It’s an arb. The smart contract worked as intended. If you want decentralized systems you have to take the good with the bad. It’s part of the game. It’s why we’re here. If you don’t like those rules, you probably shouldn’t be playing."
Lacoste quietly ditches its "UNDW3" project
However, that's vanished as the project was closed without any acknowledgement. People still have their NFTs, but can no longer earn benefits from Lacoste. Meanwhile, resale prices have dwindled to around 0.004 ETH (~$13). Angry token holders have accused Lacoste of a "soft rug pull".
Perhaps naming your crypto project "underwater" was an ill omen.
OpenSea receives SEC Wells notice
Finzer promised that the company would vigorously fight any impending lawsuit.
The lawsuit echoes previous enforcement actions by the SEC, such as a September 2023 settlement with the celebrity-backed Stoner Cats project, in which the SEC suggested that it may broadly view NFTs as securities if investors "reasonably expect to profit" from the continued efforts of those who release the NFTs.
DraftKings abruptly shutters its Reignmakers NFT project and marketplace due to "recent legal developments"
In an announcement in the project Discord and on their website, DraftKings wrote that the shutdown was "due to recent developments". They offered holders the ability to cash out their Reignmakers cards "based on factors that include, but are not limited to, the relative size and quality of your digital game piece collection". Holders were also invited to transfer their NFTs to their own cryptocurrency wallets, although the DraftKings-run "contests" in which people used their NFTs to try to earn rewards and win prizes will no longer exist. It's also unclear whether some NFTs, built to not be transferrable off-marketplace, will be able to be retained by their holders.
Members of the DraftKings Discord reacted with chagrin to the news, and doubt that the vague promises of cash payments would amount to much. "What kind of compensation u think we get coming to us? Pennies?" wrote one. "Yeah I'm out like $20k," said another. Some blamed the shutdown on a recent lawsuit from a holder of the Reignmakers NFTs who lost $14,000 — a lawsuit which recently survived the motion to dismiss stage.